Aug 29, 2007
My colleague iPhonematters
columnist Tanner Godarzi has posted a disturbing piece over on Tech
Blot, inquiring if Digg has a "Secret,
Highly Aggressive and Fatal Content Filter Machine".
Maybe not coincidentally: I noticed the post on Digg this
morning. I read it, found it plausible, even likely.
And now, back after an afternoon as Chair of the Department of
Communication and Media Studies, I see that ... the post has been
buried on Digg already. Buried, even though it has over 70
Diggs!
Which makes me think Godarzi's hypothesis is even more likely
true.
I've already written about the Digg bury
brigades, who seem to get their kicks by making sure as many
stories as they can get to don't make it to Popularity on
Digg. I've certainly seen many stories about Ron Paul -
including a few (but not all) of my own - suffer this fate.
They get 20, 30, 40, 50 Diggs in a short period of time, only to be
Buried.
Until now, I thought this was result of hyperactive buriers -
anti-Ron Paul and other people who don't like open, democratic
flows of information.
But Godarzi is suggesting something much more sinister and
destructive. He believes Digg may have a blacklist of
urls which are given very short leashes - just a few hours (unlike
the 24 hours or more for other stories), after which they are
automatically Buried, unless they have achieved Popularity.
Godarzi correctly points out that, until a few months ago, certain
urls - such as those from MySpace - were banned outright, but now
they can be entered on Digg. He wonders: did Digg
replace this clumsy form of banning with a more insidious
kind? His post (now buried) provides the technical
details of how Digg might do this ...
I'm wondering, now, too...
I hope Digg will shed some light on this blacklist.